followed · lost
Acceptable
The process was right. The market wasn't.
A journal that scores how well you followed your own rules — and treats a profitable rule-break as a warning, not a win. Trades arrive from your broker on their own.
In the real product these arrive from your broker automatically. Try one here — it grades instantly.
Demo data. Real trades and P&L stay private.
Every day lands in one of four boxes. Only the left column tells you anything repeatable — the top row is mostly luck.
Repeatable. The only box that compounds.
The process was right. The market wasn't.
Paid for breaking a rule — so you'll break it again.
Honest, and the easiest box to learn from.
Journals die because they're homework. This one reads your executed trades straight from your broker after the close and grades them.
Fills, times, quantity and real rupee P&L come from your broker account. Buys and sells are paired into round trips automatically.
Each entry is checked against the zones that were published before the session opened — so it can't be rewritten to look better afterwards.
Hit your daily trade cap and you're told during the session, while it can still change what you do.
Why you broke a rule. No API knows that, and it's the most useful line in the journal.
Most journals score pass or fail. That's a mistake when evidence can be missing.
Entry inside a rated zone, confirmation nearby, within your trade limit.
Positive evidence of a break — open-air entry, no confirmation, or past the cap.
Monitoring wasn't running, so there's no record either way. Never counted against you.